This anachronistic perspective, apparent in the choice of materials and iconography, stems from the ideological and committed stance of an artist and his relation to the political and intellectual climate in Italy in the 1960s and 1970s, in addition to his rejection of pervasive capitalism and the American way of life after the Second World War.
“Mario Merz. Time Is Mute”
11 October, 2019 – 29 March, 2020
Palacio de Velázquez Madrid
Retiro Park, Paseo Venezuela, 2, Madrid
Merz’s practice, linked to Arte Povera, incorporates different key characteristics that the coetaneous art critic Germano Celant identified with this movement: in addition to its opposition to the post-industrial society of consumerism, we find a conscious use of organic materials such as clay, branches, wax and coal.
From the application of these materials stem some of the recurring associations in the pre-modern imagery of the artist, for instance fire, lightning bolts and arrows; figures with mythical and geological meanings – the igloo, the table, the spiral, the river; or ancestral animals like the rhinoceros and the crocodile. These motifs, coupled with the idea of the nomad, run through the breadth of the artist’s poetics, vindicating lifestyles in consonance with nature that resist the predatory schemes of capitalist modernity. Thus, the search for mythology distinguished Merz’s work from his kindred contemporaries, for his archaism bore no relation to a melancholic yearning for the past, but instead was related to a razor-sharp critique of industrial and consumerist modernity.
Moreover, his biography renders an account of this political and poetic engagement — as a member of the anti-fascist resistance group Giustizia e Libertá, he was imprisoned for his activism in 1945, at a time when he started to use makeshift materials such as letters and food packaging. Very early in his career, he explored his political and social concerns in aesthetic terms, most notably in emblematic works like Igloo di Giap and Che fare?, which materialised from the fervour of May ’68 and from political and philosophical ideas that, particularly in Italy, refashioned the classical concept of Marxism regarding the role of the intellectual as a revolutionary subject.